0 Comment(s) 25/07/2008 +0100 GMT
by Brian Kirsch
The ability of event agencies to offer insurance to their clients
has been one of the important issues that the Eventia Regulation
Committee has tackled in the last three years. This is important
because, apart from being a nice little extra source of income, it puts
risk management firmly in the frame for event managers.
The
first battle was to convince the Financial Services Authority (FSA)
that agencies are not in the insurance business and so can continue to
offer event insurance to their corporate customers, provided they do it
in a certain way.
We argued that agencies were not carrying on
insurance mediation by way of business, and that they were not
mediating in insurance if they were also a party to the insurance
contract. The FSA accepted the logic of our arguments, so as long as we
all follow the rules, event insurance can once again feature in client
proposals.
Travel exemption
Then just when you
thought it was safe to go outside, the Treasury decided to review the
exemption on travel insurance, which was part of the original European
Union (EU) Insurance Mediation Directive (IMD). This said that travel
agents and tour operators didn’t have to be regulated to offer travel
insurance with connected travel services.
There was a good
reason for this – if insurance wasn’t offered at ‘point of sale’, there
was a danger that too many people would travel uninsured. There is a
well-developed and competitive market, so people have the choice of
where they buy.
A step too far
So event agencies may
have been alarmed to hear that the FSA is to start regulating the sale
of travel insurance from 1 January 2009. For many in the travel
industry this is a great disappointment – a decision by the Government
(based on some ill-informed anecdotal evidence) to extend regulation
beyond that required by the IMD. Other EU countries are not going this
far, so once again our government is putting UK business at a
disadvantage and loading it with unnecessary regulation.
The
deliberations of the Select Committee were interesting – Mike Monk from
ABTA was given the Spanish Inquisition, while representatives of
consumer groups were welcomed like prodigal sons.
Some members
of the Select Committee are under the impression that if you regulate a
particular business activity, you make it better. But this is wrong.
All it means is that if a business sells rubbish, they sell it
according to the rules that the minister decided to regulate.
Like it or not…
The
net result is that most of the travel industry is going to have to
accept this. However, it is important for agencies not to panic, and
for many in the conference and incentive travel (CIT) sector, FSA
authorisation will not be necessary.
To explain, the Eventia
Regulation Committee successfully argued the case and persuaded the
Treasury to maintain the exemption from regulation for event management
companies. This exemption applies to events they are managing for
commercial customers whose annual business turnover is more than £1
million – this will be the overwhelming majority of events for
corporate customers.
Experience counts
We were able to
make the case because Eventia members have been providing travel
insurance for their customers for the last 20 years with no evidence of
consumer detriment. On the contrary, because of the special position of
CIT companies, the insurance market has responded and developed
products which are superior from those generally available in the
market.
So do not doubt the value of your trade association,
and remember this: in each of these cases, we had the evidence and the
reasoned arguments to make the case, and the FSA and HM Treasury
listened to what we had to say, and I thank them for that. It takes
years to achieve that recognition.
Brian Kirsch is an Eventia board member and managing director of Event Assured






































